Saturday, December 19, 2009

Short Takes: Julie & Julia


Julie & Julia (2009)
Dir. Nora Ephron
Starring: Meryl Streep, Amy Adams
Grade: C+


"Julie & Julia" tells the stories of two women in search of a creative outlet. They find that outlet in cooking with their husbands quietly cheering from the sidelines. This film would have been right at home at RKO Studios circa 1940.

The two Julias are played by Meryl Streep and Amy Adams, each inhabiting different eras which might as well be different worlds. Streep plays famed American cook Julia Child, trying to find her way in post-War France. In the contemporary half of the movie, Adams, as Julie Powell, has what may be the most depressing job following 9/11: she has to deal with insurance inquiries from victims’ family members. Understandably in search of a distraction and a way to challenge her interest in writing, she challenges herself to cook her way through Julia Child’s Mastering The Art of French Cooking (first published in 1961). The film interweaves the stories of the women and, in its own clumsy way, attempts to show both how much and how little has changed between the two eras for those of the female persuasion. How Nora Ephron could have turned an interesting premise into something so disposable is beyond me.

Perhaps the most egregious aspect of the film is its need to parallel the women’s lives to each other’s. Child comes across as a fighter, a woman who refuses to be put in a box (or kept out of it). Powell, on the other hand, comes across as a petulant child at times. I would often marvel at her gigantic apartment in Long Island City, supportive husband and steady job and tried to figure out a way to empathize with her plight, whatever it was, but repeatedly failed. This is not Adams’ fault, who has blazed a trail as one of the most charming actresses in film, but because the Powell storyline is so flimsy and emotionally lacking.

Streep, not surprisingly, emerges as the emotional anchor of the film, taking on the Child persona with contagious gusto. She, of course, sounds exactly like the real Child, changes her posture and walk completely and thoroughly inhabits the role. Her story arc, however, was weakened by what I came to see as the intrusive Powell storyline, and after the admittedly exhilarating scenes where first Child masters her cooking lessons, a meandering and anticlimactic plot involving whether or not her cookbook will be published, not even the fanciest looking feast could keep me focused.

I’ll stop short of calling the film a complete disaster solely because of the performances. Streep’s is the flagship performance, but Tucci and Adams to some solid work. I was particularly thrilled by the surprise but all-too-short appearance by Jane Lynch, who always manages to bring every project she’s involved with up a notch. There are also some beautiful vistas of Paris to enrich the eyes but, for the most part, “Julie & Julia” is a dreadfully boring affair.

7 comments:

Craig Kennedy said...

Going into this one I was 100% against the Powell storyline and just wishing they'd made a movie about Julia Child.

I realize few if any 18-34 year olds probably would've gone to see such a movie so I accept this was how they had to do it.

With zero expectations, I was surprised at how the Julie parts mostly worked. I bought into the gentle uplift the movie was offering with a story about a woman taking control of her life.

Having said that, I'd still rather of seen all Julia, all the time.

Streep was so much fun to watch, and I have to say (because I keep saying it everywhere) that Stanley Tucci deserves plenty of attention for his great supporting work. He wasn't flashy, but Paul's character helped humanize an icon and he pitched it just right. The scenes between them were lovely. It was a side of Julia we never got to see on her show.

Anyway...I'd probably give it a B- but I chalk up a lot of that to very limited expectations.

Dorothy Porker said...

I definitely gave the Julie storyline a shot but it never really captured me. At one point, I was almost throwing up my hands whenever she came back on the screen. I feel the need to emphasize that it wasn't Adams' fault, I think the character is so woefully underwritten that it never works as an emotional hook for some viewers. And the goal itself (cooking her way through the recipes) was interesting at first and shows determination but it felt like a pretty weak foundation for a story when it was really all there was to it.

Tucci is really something else in everything he does. I know you've been pushing for him for "The Lovely Bones," and I hope you're right. He's one of the most effortlessly effective actors out there.

Craig Kennedy said...

The character of Julie I didn't much care for, but her plight was sympathetic to me. I know exactly how it feels to be of a certain age and not at the place in your life you expected to be and the story of her finding her mojo makes me happy.

Still, having said all that, it detracted from the story I really wanted to hear and the performances I really wanted to watch.

Dorothy Porker said...

That's the one thing that I found sympathetic about the Julie character, and God knows I feel like that sometimes, but still a part of me was like, stop whining girl, you have all of these great things, nobody is ever 100% happy with their lives! lol. I guess part of me felt that I was watching a Lifetime movie spliced with a charming Streep film.

Craig Kennedy said...

"lifetime movie spliced with a charming Streep film."

lol....that about sums it up. Not inherently a bad thing, but not as good a thing as it could've been.

Having said that, I wouldn't be sad if Meryl wins the Oscar. As you know I was really rooting for her last year, much as I thought Winslet was great.

Dorothy Porker said...

I haven't fallen in love with a particular performance this year, so I'm not really pushing for anyone, which is a rarity for me. That's why I'd be totally cool if Streep walks away with number 3 in a few months. In fact, it seems rather inevitable. I wish it could be for something as monumental as "Doubt" (even though I was rooting for Winslet last year) rather than this half-cooked offering. But it is Streep, and she should get an Oscar just for breathing, so I'm totally cool with it :)

Craig Kennedy said...

Think of it this way: If it wasn't for Streep we wouldn't even be talking about this movie.

I'm not sure why that's supposed to be a "glass is half full" statement, but it was :)

As much as I was cool on Public Enemies I thought Cotillard did a fantastic job (and Depp for that matter). I'd have to think of this some more to decide if there are other performances out of the loop, but of those who are getting talked about, Helen Mirren is terrific in The Last Station. I've cooled a lot on Carey Mulligan and An Education. I wasn't as taken by Precious as everyone else, but Gabourey Sidibe is certainly worthy.

I don't know. Right now I'd have to go with Mirren and I say that as someone who thought she was a bit overrated in The Queen (just a bit...she was still great)