Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Review: Doubt


Grade: A
Director: John Patrick Shanley
Starring: Meryl Streep, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams, Viola Davis


John Patrick Shanley’s adaptation of his Pulitzer Prize-winning play is a marvel to behold. The film is deceptively simple, as all great stories are, but there are layers upon layers lurking underneath. Like “A Streetcar Named Desire” and “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” – two other Pulitzer Prize winners successfully adapted into film – Doubt features a quartet of masterful performances that transport viewers into an alternate reality, a reality that exposes the human capacity for evil as if reflected on a funhouse mirror. The very best of humanity and the very worst are displayed in equal measure, and no one is spared in the process. This is a spectacular adaptation and one of the best films of the year.

The Plot

Set in 1964 at a Catholic school in the Bronx, recently arrived Father Flynn (played enigmatically by Philip Seymour Hoffman) butts heads with Sister Aloysius Beauvier (played exuberantly by the legendary Streep). The progressive priest’s opening sermon, on the issue of doubt, along with his interaction with some of the male students pique the curiosity of Sister Aloysius, a traditionalist who has seen it all before. Sister Aloysius, it seems, is biding her time, waiting for the opportunity to pounce and get rid of this troublemaking upstart who would not flinch at the prospect of including “Frosty the Snowman” in the school’s Christmas pageant. This opportunity materializes in the form of Sister James (a moving Amy Adams).

Sister James is an idealistic young history teacher, and one wonders if Sister Aloysius was at one time as carefree and as vulnerable. Alternately, I also wondered whether Sister James would end up exactly as Sister Aloysius, something that seems inevitable. This is an admittedly well-worn theatrical device but, to Shanley’s credit, it is executed elegantly by the actresses.

Donald Miller (played effectively by Joseph Foster) is one of the students in Sister James’ class. Miller is the only African-American student in the school. An altar boy at the beginning of the film, he has forged a bond with Father Flynn, who serves as a sort of protector and father figure. After Donald is called to Father Flynn’s rectory and returns visibly upset, Sister James reaches out to Sister Aloysius. Even though she keeps one particularly disconcerting (or perfectly innocent) incident where Flynn placed Donald’s shirt back in his locker, Sister Aloysius goes into action immediately, spending the rest of the film trying to get to the bottom of the true nature of Father Flynn’s relationship with Donald Miller.

I will not say more about the story other than these operative facts. But what follows is a clash of titanic proportions, an epic battle between Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn. These confrontations may be just about the conflict between a vindictive nun and an idealistic young priest, but they might as well be about the past against the future, progressive ideas in opposition to traditional ones, right versus wrong. Naturally, there are casualties to these battles, the question is whether there were more than there should have been.

The Performances

Hoffman, an irascible chameleon, plays Father Flynn as a man in conflict with the world. He wants to bring progressive ideas into the church, yet chastises Sister Aloysius if she breaks the chain of command. He proclaims he has nothing to hide, but almost every word that comes out of his mouth is vague and ambiguous. This hesitation adds to our suspicions, and Hoffman only lets us in for small glimpses, so we’re left where we began, and our only recourse is to reconstruct the puzzle and try to put the damning and vindicating pieces together. To watch Hoffman and Streep go at it in their various confrontations is one of the reasons the medium was created – they are magnetic and enthralling. His is a complex performance, well worth all the attention it has attracted.

Adams, a charming and gifted actor, excels as Sister James. Like the great Sandy Dennis in “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?” she’s saddled with a role that is more a symbol than a multi-dimensional character, but, like Dennis, Adams instills Sister James with complexities that go well beyond the written page. Similarly, Viola Davis, who plays Donald Miller's mom, does the impossible with a limited amount of time. She crafts a character that is simultaneously sympathetic and reprehensible. Davis’ Ms. Miller is a tortured soul, a mother who wants to see her son succeed so badly that she is willing to put him in dangerous situations. The hope is that his future will be that much brighter, even if he has to suffer as the first African-American child at the school, or worse. There is not one false note in Davis’ intelligent, unforgettable performance.

And then there’s Streep’s Sister Aloysius – in a characterization that is not so much a performance, but a master class. Much has been written about her performance, which, to my amazement has not been universally lauded. This is one of the best (if not the best) performances of the year. Streep is in her element – she stalks every scene with a self-assurance and a sense of superiority that is frightening. The children are terrified of her and this is precisely what she expects and thrives on.

Yet the same nun that can drag out an unruly child by his collar can lovingly help an elderly nun eat her meal. Sister Aloysius is kind to her fellow nuns and a willing, if cold, mentor to young Sister James. Sister Aloysius is tender and funny, obsessive and judgmental – she is human and therefore flawed. Streep expertly paints a portrait of one of the most interesting, palpably rich characters ever brought to the screen. Sister Aloysius will stay with you long after you’ve seen the film.

Overall

Aesthetically, there is no denying that this is a stage adaptation – but Shanley has a good eye (even if that eye is a bit too enamored of lopsided camera angles) and a steady hand with his actors. The film looks beautiful and I enjoyed many of the theatrical excesses – especially the wind motif, a poetic image that grows darker as we slowly begin to realize what it symbolizes. But this is an acting showcase first and foremost, and for that accomplishment alone, it is one of the best films of the year.

Streep is so good at what she does that I caught myself chuckling more often than not at her ingenuity and her obvious joy in doing what she does, not to mention the fact that Sister Aloysius is often very funny. Please excuse my hyperbole, but this is what it must have felt to watch Mozart compose or Van Gogh paint. This is the stuff of greatness. Streep, quite simply, cannot stop topping herself and we’re much better off for it.

7 comments:

siutou_amy said...

Dorothy! I'm so happy you got to watch Doubt!! And even more happy with how content you seem to be with the film...

Indeed, Streep is one of the best (if not the best) performance of the year in here, and the film is so great because of the ambiguity of the story.

Dorothy Porker said...

Thanks, amy. Re-reading my review, I noticed that I'm at my cheesiest (ever), but I can't help it -- I really loved the film and especially the performances. It's just terrific.

Jim T said...

First of all, great site! I enjoyed your case for Winslet a lot and I can't wait for the second part!

Now, about the review. I agree with almost anything. The only part I disagree is about Mrs Miller. The way you put it makes it seem as if she wants her son to be successful and she doesn't care about his happiness. I think she just wants the "lesser evil" (if that't how it's said) for him. It's not about his career or anything. Maybe I misinterpreted what you wrote but I just wanted to clarify that.

Dorothy Porker said...

Thank you very much, Jim and welcome. I'm particularly glad you enjoyed the film as much as I did, there's only a few of us out there so we have to stick together :)

SPOILER ALERT
As to the Miller character, I hope I didn't come across too harshly. Indeed, I attempted to convey that she is sympathetic. Still, it's shocking to hear a mother say "he can have him!" when confronted with what is disturbing information. I don't doubt (no pun intended) that she wants the best for Donald and this includes a bright future with a good education so he can go to college, but because of his own proclivities, she doesn't see the potential harm in having this man continue an inappropriate relationship with her child. It's willful blindness and it's scary, but it's also humanized by Davis' performance.

SPOILER ENDS

In short, I think we agree there. And I do have a tendency to come across a bit too strongly about certain issues.

"The Case for Kate Winslet: The 2000s" will be up soon, by the way!

Craig Kennedy said...

Layers! Ambiguity! Yes!

First of all, thrilled you see the light with Doubt, Dorothy. As you know by now it's one of my favorite movies of the year and it only grows stronger in my mind the farther I get from it (compared to a number of others I was deeply jazzed about, but have since receded in my esteem).

The acting is the main drawing card here as you note, but that mighty combination of simplicity with layers you also mention is what really puts it over for me. It all seems so obvious and easily swallowed on the surface, but the more you think about it (thinking that's hopefully touched off by the ambiguous ending) the richer and more full-bodied it becomes.

Both the writing and the performances play into the layers as well. All of the characters are revealed to be more subtly defined than the near stereotypes we're first presented with and all four actors make the most of the shadings they're giving. None of them behave exactly as you'd expect them to, yet all of their actions make complete sense.

I admit that some of the symbolism was overplayed (I kinda liked the wind too, but I have to admit it was a bit much) and there were other elements that lacked a certain cinematic subtlety, but damnit it worked.

I won't gush anymore about Streep other than to say I completely agree. If she doesn't win the Oscar I won't pitch a fit, but she's the one I'm rooting for.

Craig Kennedy said...

Also, never be afraid of being cheesy! Ok, I say that as a guy who's guilty of being cheesy more often than not so take that advice with a grain of salt.

vlc said...

Great review DP! I think she's gonna win.