
Dir. Saul Dibb
Starring: Keira Knightley, Ralph Fiennes
Grade: B
“The Duchess” (a.k.a. “The Duchess Wears Prada”) starts off promisingly enough. Young G (short for Georgiana) is with her friends on the grounds of a sumptuous estate so common to romantic British period films. G is the leader of the pack, and the obvious target of attraction by one of the young men preparing for a race. G passes around a hat to the other ladies, and each one pulls out a piece of paper with a particular boy's name. G informs the aforementioned young man (Charles Grey, played by the hapless Dominic Cooper) that she has bet on him to win, which, of course, he does. The crispness of the green grass, blue sky and the freedom of youth can only mean one thing – young love is in the air, and therefore, something wicked this way comes.
And like clockwork, there is William Cavendish, fifth Duke of Devonshire (played by a wonderfully sinister Fiennes), surveying the scene from inside the estate. Or should I say surveying his soon-to-be property, since Cavendish is entering into a deal with G’s mother Lady Spencer (played by the regal Charlotte Rampling) to make G his new bride. Lady Spencer guarantees that G has the goods and will surely give him a male heir. Informed of the transaction later that day, G is surprised – she’s only met the Duke twice before, he couldn’t possibly love her. Of course, whether G herself loves the Duke does not even enter into the equation.
The match having been made – a quick wedding ceremony and a public coming out follow. The public adores their new Duchess, she is young (but sixteen when the Duke takes her as his wife) and has a unique style. I’m hopeless when it comes to fashion, so all I noticed were the gargantuan hats. There is one particular exchange to this point that I found interesting. During their wedding night, the Duke, as he’s undressing G (equipped with scissors!) comments that he could never understand women’s complicated dresses. G explains that it’s their only way to express themselves, as opposed to men, who have several avenues for self-expression. After that, the Duke finds yet another way to express himself as he makes love to his child bride – it is a repellant scene and one that sets the tone for the rest of the surprisingly bleak film.
The rest of the narrative deals with G’s attempts (and failures) to birth a male heir as well as the Duke’s multiple infidelities and emotional distance (he is kinder and more attentive to his dogs than he is to poor G) which deepen the wedges of the arranged marriage. G withdraws from her husband, becoming the darling of society in the process. She meets Bess Foster (played outstandingly by Hayley Atwell), a mother of three who has been victimized by her estranged husband. G and Bess forge a strong bond of friendship (and perhaps more, or at least as much is suggested). Somewhat gullibly, G figures out a way for Bess to move into the Devonshire estate. It is this decision which throws the film into an inevitable, fatal detour into “telenovela” territory – a road paved in histrionics, romantic hokum (courtesy of Charles Grey’s return), and even a wig engulfed in flames (this being the unintentionally hilarious highlight of the film for me).
Which is a shame since the film could have been a strong statement about the condition of women in 18th century aristocracy. It could have also been a great vehicle for Knightley, who even here, proves that she is a top-rate actor and more than capable of carrying an entire film on her seemingly frail shoulders. Instead, we have a conventional, technically adept, but emotionally vacant romantic biography that is neither romantic nor biographical, but rather a mishmash of ideas and set-pieces that say absolutely nothing that has not already been said more eloquently and movingly dozens of times before.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Short Takes: The Duchess
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Beautifully said, my goddess.
*applauds wildly*
You liked THE DUCHESS much more than me. (I guess it's the divide between a B and a C- technically.) But a lot of our reactions are identical.
Though I adore RALPH FIENNES (have forever and will until I die), I never HATED him as much as I did here. When the Duke said to Georgiana, "I love you in the way that I understand love," it was all I could do NOT to hurl the contents of my purse at the screen.
EVEN THE HEAVY STUFF.
If "loving" someone entails massive ongoing infidelity and raping your wife while your mistress (who has moved into the same house with both of you and is totally aware of what you're doing) has knowledge of your behaviour and actively TOLERATES it, then somebody will have to pay.
BIG TIME.
G was such a lovely girl, too. That made the situation even more disturbing to me. It was awful.
I recall reading an interview with Keira where she said that it was very difficult for her to get upset or angry with all the corsetry that she had on. She said she would try to build up a big head of steam and then she would feel faint and lightheaded and wouldn't be able to explode or express herself as normal.
So that was definitely calculated. Those clothes were part of the big encompassing scenario to keep women in their places. Truly insidious.
It is a gorgeous film to look at. Costumes, cinematography and art direction are all perfectly glorious.
I imagine in this SUPPOSEDLY post feminist age that TD is more of a cautionary tale - and something to show definitively how far we've come from the dark ages.
But I found it relentlessly depressing.
As I'm sure you know, Georgiana's life was genuinely like that and her descendent, Princess Diana, actually fared no better.
This stuff has been going on for centuries...and women STILL get the shaft.
Anyway, awesome review, D.
WELL DONE!!!!!
*stamps china doll feet and whistles*
It's funny, I think we end up at about the same place with this one Dorothy (about a B), but we take opposite paths to get there. For me, the opening was all very routine and predictable. Not unentertaining, but I was beginning to think the movie was going to be a dud. As it went along and her cage became more and more constricting, I really warmed up to it. The drama and the histrionics didn't bug me, but I was compelled by how trapped she was and how her every attempt at gaining even the smallest measure of freedom was squashed.
I think it finally won me over when her children, the one thing that gave her life some measure of joy, were actually used as a weapon against her by the duke. That's pretty hard core.
I didn't find it emotionally vacant at all. The romance angle did nothing for me, but her plight was tragic and moving. When you factor in the parallels Miranda mentions to Princess Diana, it all comes home for me. Depressing and bleak? Yes, but sometimes that's how it goes. I don't mind depressing if I take something away from it and I felt like I did in this case.
What's strange is I went into this one expecting another weepy costumer that I'm not necessarily a big fan of. My hopes were low, but I was nicely surprised.
Thanks for the comments, guys. As always, I strive to get better at this, so friendly encouragement is always a plus!
Ms. M, I agree about the G character. She was incredibly sweet (the fact that she took on Charlotte was so beautiful to me -- and she was great with all the children and such a good friend to Bess). And boy, was it depressing! Just...like Craig says, when the Duke uses the children (and Charles) as pawns, well, it's all quite horrible. I adore Ralph, yes, but he was pretty despicable. Still, you can tell he had a blast playing this loser.
Craig, my hopes were low with this one but I came out liking it (not loving it, but appreciating it). I guess what I'm saying about the set up is that, at least in that first exchange with the Duke, it seemed to suggest a different path, and then we get the usual can't have a boy, all I have are girls spiel (see The Other Boleyn Girl). Most interesting of all was the Bess/G relationship, and I wish we could have seen more of that. The script showed beautifully how they related as mothers and as women.
The Bess/G stuff was good and the way they were also turned against each other reminded me of one of my favorite movies Raise the Red Lantern. The way all the women were in the same situation, but fought with one another rather than banding together to fight back.
I don't know, stuff like that is wrenching to me and compelling, even if it ends badly.
It sounds though that even though neither of our expectations were high, they were still somewhat different.
I feel like I've been disagreeing with you a lot lately, but I hope you know I like your sharp perceptions and thoughtful observations. You also have a clean, no nonsense, literate style that is nice to read.
And this is why I adore you, D...
"Still, you can tell he had a blast playing this loser."
Too funny!!!
Also, FULLY concur with Mr. Kennedy'a assessment on your writing.
Keep going. We're all waiting (with bated breath) for the new stuff...
Aw shucks, you guys are too sweet :) Craig, I ADORE "Raise the Red Lantern" if not all of the Li/Yimou collabos (what a duo!). While "The Story of Qiu Ju" remains my fave, "Raise the Red Lantern" is certainly close behind it.
Post a Comment