Sunday, January 4, 2009

Review: Revolutionary Road - "Everybody knows the truth, even if they've lived their whole life without it."



Everybody loves Frank and April Wheeler. The Wheelers are the best couple down on Revolutionary Road. There's just something special about them.

Public perception of the Wheelers doesn't quite match up with what goes on behind closed doors at their handsome Revolutionary Road home. Neither Frank (Leonardo DiCaprio) nor April (Kate Winslet) are living the life they had imagined for themselves when they first met years earlier at a party. Frank is still figuring out what it is he wants for himself, and April is studying to be an actress. They have big dreams, dreams that do not include suburbia. When April becomes pregnant, she and Frank get married and decide to settle down, at least for a little while. They are in love, and realtor Helen Givings (Kathy Bates) has found a charming home in the suburbs for them to live in. They are hopeful that they can escape the traps of typical suburban life. After all, they have dreams and aspirations that go beyond Revolutionary Road, the suburbs, and Connecticut.



Years (and one child) later, Frank and April are still there, but have largely given up on the future they had always imagined and have resigned themselves to the typical man-woman, husband-wife, father-mother roles expected of them in 1955. Frank is in sales, working at the same company his father worked in -- a job and a company Frank vowed never to work when he was a child. April is a wife and a mother, and though she is a studied actress, she's stuck performing in bad productions at a local school. The tenor of their relationship has changed dramatically, which is summed up by Frank's first words to a devastated April after she stars in a disaster of a play: "Well it wasn't exactly a triumph, was it?"

Frank and April are trying to fit into their roles, predetermined by society at that time, but they are not cut out for it at all. As a result, they are punishing one another. Frank has insecurities about his own manliness, which is a button April knows to push, and so he grips onto his position as the head of the family. April, who is intelligent, determined, and independent, is stuck in a time where she really is not allowed to be intelligent, determined, and independent. This creates a huge imbalance in their relationship, and that imbalance is at the root of their problems.

Things change for them, though, when April suggests they move to Paris. Frank had been there years before, and had always wanted to go back. April believes it will give Frank the time he needs to figure out what, exactly, will make him happy, while she works as a secretary at a government office (you won't believe how much they pay for secretarial jobs over there!) and support them until he finds his calling. He agrees, and they set this plan in motion.

They are happy again.

The reactions to their news from Frank's coworkers and their neighbors, Shep and Milly Campbell (David Harbour and Kathryn Hahn), are tepid, at best. Frank's colleagues don't believe they'll go through with it, and don't even bother acting supportive like the Campbells, who put on an encouraging front but agree that it's immature and childish when they are alone. Frank and April don't care, and laugh together at the people who don't believe them.

They even get some reinforcement when Helen Givings introduces them to her son, John Givings (Michael Shannon), a mathematician who was recently released from a mental institution. A self-described "certified lunatic," John Givings is a breath of fresh air for Frank and April. He is honest and forthright, able to see through the bullshit of 1950s suburban life and unafraid to point it out. They tell John that they want to escape the "emptiness and hopelessness" of their lives there, and John is stunned. It doesn't take much to see the emptiness, he says, but it takes real courage to acknowledge the hopelessness. Frank and April find the situation humorous; how is it that the only other person they've come across who understands their desire to leave Revolutionary Road is crazy?

Things start to change, though, when Frank is offered a promotion. Frank is bolstered by this newfound success at work, and coupled with his male colleagues questioning his decision to allow April to support him financially in Paris, he starts to feel uneasy about the move to Paris. He is finally starting to fit into his role as the man of the house, so why would he give that up for something new and completely unfamiliar?

Their happiness really starts to unravel when April reveals she is ten weeks pregnant with their third child. It's a pregnancy she sees as an inconvenience; it's not a child she truly wants, and the timing is terrible. April knows that having this baby will keep them stuck on Revolutionary Road. She expresses her desire to Frank to have an abortion, because it is safe to do until week twelve, but Frank is not on board.

The rest of the film really explores their very different feelings on this pregnancy (although Frank is able to use the pregnancy, rather than his raised status at work, as a reason to stay in Connecticut), and I would hate to give everything else away.

Revolutionary Road is a thought-provoking, intense film that is executed very well. I do have a couple of problems with the film as a whole. There are elements of the novel that just didn't translate very well to the screen. The pacing of the film didn't really work for me. Reading the book, I had a much better sense of the amount of time passing, as well as the ups and downs of their relationship. Condensed into a two hour film, the bitter arguing just gets exhausting. I also don't think the screenplay did enough to establish the characters of Frank and April or their relationship. Not enough emphasis was made on Frank's insecurities, which would have provided a better context for his behavior towards the end of the film, and I don't think enough emphasis went into April's dreams of being an actress. You know she's studied, you know she has performed in at least one play while living at Revolutionary Road, but I, personally, would have appreciated a little bit more exploration of her own dreams outside of her marriage and family. As a tacked on note: the score, by one of my favorite composers, Thomas Newman, is largely forgettable and doesn't add anything at all to the film.

With that said, I can't speak highly enough about the performances. Leonardo DiCaprio does the best work of his career as Frank Wheeler. He is unguarded and vulnerable, and goes all out on the charm and the insecurities simmering beneath the surface. Kate Winslet is as excellent as you would expect her to be. Together, they are perfect. It's clear they are friends and trust each other, because they are totally unrestrained during their arguments.

Michael Shannon as John Givings is a real highlight for me. He's just fantastic, it's a performance you really have to see to understand what I am talking about. He is only in two or three scenes, and while it's pretty understated performance, he dominates the screen every second he's on it. Kathy Bates as his mother, Helen, is very good, but she doesn't really have a lot to do in the film.

Director Sam Mendes and cinematographer Roger Deakins are a great team. I imagine Mendes didn't have to direct his leading actors all that much, but there is some brilliant camerawork here. For most of the movie, they have set up very still, very staged, very clean shots. When Frank and April have their biggest argument yet, towards the end of the film, they use handheld cameras, perfectly capturing the frantic and panicked nature of the scenes. Once it's over it's back to the very still, very staged, very clean shots. The lighting on April, towards the end of the film, really stood out to me as well. This is a beautifully shot film, no question.

Though there are a few problems with the film, it will get you thinking and talking and it definitely boasts some of the strongest acting of the year.

Grade: high B+ / low A-

7 comments:

Dorothy Porker said...

Excellent review -- I'm vacillating between the A-/B+ territory as well. I thought DiCaprio, in particular, was phenomenal.

Sam Juliano said...

"Revolutionary Road is a thought-provoking, intense film that is executed very well. I do have a couple of problems with the film as a whole. There are elements of the novel that just didn't translate very well to the screen. The pacing of the film didn't really work for me. Reading the book, I had a much better sense of the amount of time passing, as well as the ups and downs of their relationship. Condensed into a two hour film, the bitter arguing just gets exhausting. I also don't think the screenplay did enough to establish the characters of Frank and April or their relationship. Not enough emphasis was made on Frank's insecurities, which would have provided a better context for his behavior towards the end of the film, and I don't think enough emphasis went into April's dreams of being an actress. You know she's studied, you know she has performed in at least one play while living at Revolutionary Road, but I, personally, would have appreciated a little bit more exploration of her own dreams outside of her marriage and family. As a tacked on note: the score, by one of my favorite composers, Thomas Newman, is largely forgettable and doesn't add anything at all to the film."

Well, therein lies the crux of your comprehensive review and the rightful issues you bring up, which I must evince wholehearted agreement with. It won't make my Top 10 list, and for basically what you take issue with here. I agree with you that the acting is superlative by both (I wonder if Ms. Winslet with nab two Oscar nods?) and Di Caprio has now delivered what I see as his most mature work. Michael Shannon is indeed excellent and is a scene-stealer. As you stated at the end of your most vital paragraph, Thomas Newman, who is ordinarily quite dependable has not added this time with anything but a servicable score. And yet again I agree that the film's lensing (nice point there with the last shot on Winslet) and the use of hand-helds is very effective.

I would also have to agree with the final grade--it does range between the A minus and B plus level.

Excellent and comprehensive review here, one of the best I've seen on this film.

k said...

Thanks, Dorothy and Sam.

It's a shame about Thomas Newman. I've yet to hear a Newman score I disliked until now. This is a film that really could have benefited from a great score, and when I found out Thomas Newman was doing the music I got excited, but it was just so boring. It didn't take away from the film, but it didn't add anything. It was just there.

I loved the way this film was shot. The cinematography was gorgeous. I loved that, the morning after their massive fight, while Frank is telling her how swell the breakfast was by the door, April is in the shadows. Frank is surrounded by light, but she is surrounded by darkness. Then you get to that last shot of her, by the window, and she looks almost ethereal... everything about the way this film, particularly the ending, was shot was just gorgeous.

If I had to give this film a number grade, it would be like, an 89.5/100. So it's either a B+ or you round it up to an A-. I had it on B+ initially, then I changed it to an A-, but I really can't decided one way or the other. I would recommend people see it, absolutely with at least one other person, because I had a really interesting conversation about the film afterward. It's a great film to discuss and dissect, it definitely makes you think and gets you talking.

maria said...

Been enjoying all of your recent reviews here! Thank you for sharing your thoughts so articulately with us!

I thought it was amazing that I didn't feel one single false note in RR. Usually, with fighting scenes I often feel that the actors are overdoing it or I just sense the acting out, meaning I feel like an outsider looking in, calm and somewhat confused as to why the people on the screen are fighting. But in RR I never felt that way. Phenomenal performances by both. Leonardo DiCaprio: I just can't get over how well he was in the final fighting scene. Kate Winslet: To me she can do no wrong. I think we're so used to her being great it's hard to be surprised by her. But I think we mustn't overlook what she accomplishes: she evokes sympathy for a character who on page doesn't. And to me - someone who hasn't read the book - she fills everything that's not there in the script with her acting. I felt I understood her character.

From what I had heard I expected 2 hours of fighting so I was pleasantly surprised by the middle part and wasn't as exhausted by the fighting as I had braced myself for.

nick plowman said...

As you know, this is one of my absolute favourite films of last year, and I don't think it hit a false note, but of course such things are subjective and I understand that.

Although we disagree here on a few things - not disagree so much as we both seemed to have wanted different things from the film after reading the book perhaps - we agree with a lot more, especially on the quality of the performances, from Winslet whom I worship and adore with a passion (I think she is my favourite actress) and DiCaprio whom I have only recently come to stand gives his career best performance that I didn't expect from him at all. The supporting cast were great too, Shannon in particular but Kathy Bates was good too.

It is a beautifully crafted, intense film that, yes, gets you thinking and questioning and I loved that fact. Wonderful review here indeed.

k said...

Maria, I think the middle third of the film, where they are happy, did act as a nice buffer, but I did think that there were some problems with the pacing. I also feel like the flashbacks could have been better, or provided more insight to their early relationship. I enjoyed it quite a bit, though.

And Nick, I really liked the film, but there was a feeling from the book that just didn't translate well to the screen. There was one line in particular, one of Frank's from the end of the book, that I wanted to see in the film, but they cut it out!

Craig Kennedy said...

Terrific review K. You really vocalized a couple of the issues I had with Rev Road, the smaller one of the pacing (it felt too condensed to me) and the larger one of Leo's character. A little more development of his character's insecurities would've really helped make him a more sympathetic character in the 2nd half. As it is, he almost simply becomes the bad guy.

As I've said one too many times elsewhere, I love Michael Shannon and in a different movie I would've loved his performance here, but for me it was ultimately too much. I blame the writing and the directing not the actor however.

Also, I kind of liked the score. It was awfully subtle (and a bit repetitive) but it worked for me.

Anyway, we agree 100% on the performances of Kate and Leo and they were enough to get me to watch the movie a 2nd time to see if I'd like it better.