Thursday, January 15, 2009

Review: Let The Right One In


Let The Right One In (2008)
Dir. Tomas Alfredson
Grade: A


Tomas Alfredson’s Let The Right One In” is the type of strangely moving film that stays with you long after seeing it. Manohla Dargis called it a “spectrally beautiful Swedish vampire movie,” which succinctly captures the essence of the film. Without the benefit of reading the book the film is based on, I am only informed by the film itself, which with bleak tones and steady direction creates a world that is as original as it is familiar. The young performers give remarkably good performances, and Tomas Alfredson displays real talent with a style reminiscent of Spain’s enfant terrible, Alejandro Amenábar.



The Plot

The film tells the unconventional story of Oskar (the talented Kåre Hedebrant), a twelve-year old boy who is mercilessly bullied in school by a crew of kids who tease him, beat him up, and harass him on a daily basis. Living with his mother in an unremarkable apartment complex, his life revolves around school, home, and his trips to visit his dad. Oskar is painfully introverted and consumed by a desire to seek revenge on those who harm him. He keeps a scrapbook underneath his bed where he collects gruesome news articles.

The first time we see Oskar, a young blond boy standing by a window, his hand reaching out and touching the glass recalls one of Bergman’s motifs (think of the boys in “The Silence,” “Persona,” and “Fanny Och Alexander,” among others). And that’s not where the Bergman similarities end – like “Hour of the Wolf,” it incorporates vampirism as a plot device. Here, however, the vampire is not an aristocratic intellectual, but Oskar’s androgynous twelve year old new neighbor. I say androgynous because it is not clear in the film whether Eli (the impressive Lina Leandersson) is a boy or a girl, neither or both (although Eli does declare more than once “I’m not a girl”). This element of ambiguity is one of the many carefully woven threads that run through this superficially simple but ultimately complex tale as Eli and Oskar forge a beautiful bond.

The film is decidedly bleak both in content and visually. There is no real sense of time (Is this a contemporary film? A period piece? Are we in the 1970s? The 1980s?) other than night and day. Hoyte van Hoytema’s cinematography is vital to the mood of the film – the almost synthetic darkness of the night, the blankets of snow, and the stillness and controlled camerawork - it all adds up to a remarkably other-worldly vibe using the most basic of techniques and imbues the film with a consistent sense of foreboding that does not let go until the final frame.

Eli is an enigma. She (I’ll refer to her as a female for the purpose of this review) is twelve, but has been on earth for much longer (perhaps centuries). She is both compassionate and cruel toward her caretaker, Håkan (Per Ragnar), and conflicted about having to kill people in order to survive. One of the first things she tells Oskar in the desolate playground of the apartment complex is “I can’t be your friend.” Yet there she is, night after night, engaging with the smitten Oskar, even playing with a Rubik's cube at his suggestion.

By all accounts, Håkan is an incompetent helper. He might have been effective as a younger man (assuming he has been with Eli that long), but the act of killing and obtaining blood for Eli becomes more and more difficult for him, as he makes mistake after mistake. As horrific as the scenes involving Håkan are, there is still a bit of humor thrown in for good measure. During the first attack we witness, for instance, Håkan panics when he hears people approaching him (and his unfortunate young victim) and in his desperation to escape unseen, he forgets to take the bucket of blood he’s collected. It’s truly funnier than it reads.

As Oskar and Eli get closer, Oskar begins to get out of his shell inch by inch. This is not a Hollywood film, though, so his “transformation” is decidedly subtle. He joins the weight-lifting crew and even takes Eli out. One of the sweetest scenes (and there are quite a few between these two) involves Oskar’s reaction when Eli gets sick after eating candy.

But this is a suspense film, after all, and there is plenty of stylized gore. Lacking a big budget, Alfredson is nevertheless able to deliver some thrills in very creative ways that invoke all senses. Whenever Oskar is close to Eli, he seems to smell something foul at times (is Eli rotting in the flesh when she is in desperate need of blood?). When Eli is hungry, we hear a disturbingly animalistic growl emanating from her small frame, not to mention her paleness and disheveled appearance during her most desperate moments. Eli’s superhuman abilities (she can climb walls, fly, and overtake adults) are conveyed matter-of-factly. Indeed, these abilities (and most of the goriest incidents) are not shown as much as suggested, leaving plenty to the imagination while simultaneously excising any doubt. The ultimate showdown of the film, set at a pool, is the perfect example of this type of masterful, efficient, and innovative filmmaking. While the film does falter at times when it takes on some of the broader, iconic aspects of vampirism (and during an ill-advised sequence involving some obviously CGI cats) the honesty of the story, its characters and the storytelling make it an indelible movie-going experience.

The Performances

There must be something in the water in Sweden, a country that has given us some of the greatest actors to grace the silver screen. Alfredson is very adept at working with children. The director does not condescend or put on display impossibly cute children, but rather gets down to their level (literally, the children dominate the film’s canvas as opposed to being dominated by it). Hedebrant as Oskar is very touching. Oskar goes through every possible emotion in the book, and Hedebrant steps up to the plate at each point. Leandersson is equally (if not more) effective – her gigantic eyes and thoughtful cadences are haunting. The supporting cast, including some locals and Oskar’s classmates, bring some color to a dreary palette.

Overall

There are some slightly uncomfortable scenes involving the children, but I did not feel like they were exploited in any way. This is not “The Exorcist,” a film that I admire intensely, but which gets more and more disturbing as I grow older because of the fact that Linda Blair’s parents allowed their thirteen-year-old child to be involved in it.

Notwithstanding this occasional discomfort, there is not one superfluous moment in the film, and its success or failure literally depended on the Oskar/Eli dynamic. It is because of them that it does work as successfully as it does.

This is a story about two lonely children who find comfort in one another and, perhaps, the first semblance of love, and whose world is made a bit warmer by the other. It is one of the best films of the year.

16 comments:

Craig Kennedy said...

I continue to be surprised at the breadth of people who love this film. It crosses lines between arthouse snobs and genre freaks.

And that's a good thing.

When I first saw it, mostly I'd heard from the fanboy internet types so I wasn't expecting something so quietly haunting and beautiful. I think because of that in many ways I underestimate the film and I'd like to watch it again.

There weren't a lot of traditional moments of horror and that made the ones there were even more effective.

Quite an interesting film. One that's kind of hard to classify, but that makes it even better.

Dorothy Porker said...

You should definitely see it again, Craig. It's worth re-visiting, if anything because there are so many details that one is sure to miss out on after just one viewing.

And now you've got me thinking: am I an arthouse snob (possible) or a genre freak (that too) or somewhere in between (even likelier)! :)

Matthew Lucas said...

I <3 this movie so much. Every time it gets a good review it makes my heart smile a little bit.

Dorothy Porker said...

I've been seeing a lot of great films during the past few weeks -- it was a good year for films indeed, and this was definitely one of the best.

Alexander Coleman said...

This is a beautiful review, Dorothy. One of my favorite components of the film and your uniquely fecund review is that it seems to take place in no particular time, and barely a specific place. We assume it is a contemporary film, but it need not be. It is a remarkably closed-off, insular film. The similarities to Bergman were recognized by me as well, and I'm grateful to you for bringing attention to them here. And this--"There must be something in the water in Sweden, a country that has given us some of the greatest actors to grace the silver screen." So very, very true! You've made me like it more than I have, and made me most interested in taking another look at it whenever it appears on DVD. Thank you.

Craig Kennedy said...

I think you're definitely in between Dorothy which is a great place to be. That's where I try to hang out anyway.

siutou_amy said...

Weeeee! Great to read your review on the film, and happy to read that you enjoyed it. It's interesting that you mentioned Alejandro Amenabar, since The Others is another film that I enjoyed quite a lot.

Your description of Oskar and Eli is spot on! And the mention of Leandersson's eyes, LOL'

After the film, I read the book... there are a few things left from the book, that I thought gave it more thrills, but still enjoyed the film a whole lot more~~ ^^

Now, if only Sweden could've sent two films for award consideration~~ xD

Dorothy Porker said...

Alexander, thank you for the kind words. I'm glad you were as moved by the film as I was and that you also picked up on the Bergman similarities. To me, Bergman is *the* god of cinema, so it's a great compliment we're paying Alfredson. I'm very much looking forward to his next piece and will try to unearth some of his earlier work.

Amy, I'm happy you're a fan of the film, too! That's great. And I was absolutely thinking of "The Others" (as well as "Abre Los Ojos") when I brought up Amenabar. He has a real talent and is capable of working across genres.

And yeah, bummer that Sweden wasn't able to submit it for the Oscars. It will hopefully sneak into other categories, a la "City of God." I'd love for it to get nods for best adapted screenplay, best original score (Johan Söderqvist's score is my favorite of the year), and anything else they can throw in :)

Craig Kennedy said...

Was Sweden unABLE to submit it or did they just choose not to? I have this feeling a lotof people underestimated its awards/arthouse potential sight unseen because it was a "vampire picture".

Dorothy Porker said...

I read somewhere that the film missed some sort of release date within Sweden and so didn't make the cut. It has been recognized nationally, though, as the recipient of several national awards.

Having said that, this could all be bullshit. I don't remember the source :(

Alexander Coleman said...

I believe it had to be released in the US of A before October 1 to be qualified, but it was released three weeks or so later. Sweden went with another film--I'm not sure if they chose to not have Let the Right One In represent their country, or if they were cornered into not.

I consider Bergman the god of cinema as well!

darkthirty said...

This movie moved me in a different way than any other movie has, and I've seen lots - surely a sign of some careful art at work. In fact, it reminded me forcefully of my own youth, and what it felt like to, yunno, fall in love for the first time - at least, as much as I can remember of how that felt. Add to this not only fear of others, of not belonging, but of the terrors of incipient self-consciousness, and it adds up to some impact. Has the vampire myth ever been put to such a use so expertly?

Dorothy Porker said...

Thanks for posting, darkthirty. I wholeheartedly agree. It surely brought back my own years as a pre-adolescent, and my upbringing could not have been more different (or further away) from the world so carefully created by Alfredson and co. The use of vampirism was a stroke of genius. I'm looking forward to reading the book.

Sam Juliano said...

Ingmar Bergman is my #1 director of all-time, hence I have always been thrilled with your PERSONA avitar Dorothy. When he died last year, I had a comprehensive festival at my house that ran for several weeks, and was attended by over 20 people, who attended a number of the screenings:
My 10 favorite Bergmans:
1) Persona
2) Cries and Whispers
3) Wild Strawberries
4) Sawdust and tinsel
5) Fanny and Alexander
6) Winter Light
7) The Seventh Seal
8) Smiles of a Summer Night
9) The Silence
10) Summer Interlude

Anyway, kudos to you for your beautifully-written and passionate appraisal of the excellent Swedish vampire movie you review here. I am a big fan.

Alison Flynn said...

As you may have seen me proclaim again and again over at LiC, I adored this movie. It made #1 on my list this year.

This was a stunning and perceptive write-up of the film. Excellent job!

Dorothy Porker said...

Thanks so much for stopping by (and for the kind words), Alison!

And yes, we're definitely in the same boat with LTROI. I saw it for the second time last week and it just gets better. I can't get over how effectively and seamlessly Alfredson combines genres. He's one to keep an eye out for.